chevron-thin-right chevron-thin-left brand cancel-circle search youtube-icon google-plus-icon linkedin-icon facebook-icon twitter-icon toolbox download check linkedin phone twitter-old google-plus facebook profile-male chat calendar profile-male
Ask a question
The Unit Testing Company
Development Resources
Knowledge Base
Welcome to Typemock Community! Here you can ask and receive answers from other community members. If you liked or disliked an answer or thread: react with an up- or downvote.

Related questions

Help to mock method with no return value w/ Mock/MockObject?

0 votes
We are using TypeMock to mock business logic classes in a product which is still work-in-progress; our mocked classes provide mocked data for the UI layer until such time as our back-end is up and running.

I can work out how to use Mock and MockObject to mock classes, and property gets/sets, and even methods with return values (via AlwaysReturn and ExpectGetAlways).

However I'd like to know how to mock a method which has no return value (Sub in VB.NET, Void in C#) and when the real method is called either:

1) Always do nothing

2) Always call my own mocked implementation of the method in our own mocked assembly class

I've looked at the documentation and Mock/MockObject.ExpectAlways and also the MethodSettings object but am not clear how to go about doing what I want?

Thanks.

-Alastair
asked by alastair.cameron@kal
Report User
 (3.4k points)

3 Answers

0 votes
Hi
When you want the unmocked implementation to be called use 
mock.ExpectUnmockedSet("Start").Args(New ParameterCheckerEx(AddressOf MockStartPropertySet))


What I meant is if you have code like this: 
myClass.Start = otherClass.Method();


If you want to set myClass.Start to a specific value
You can do this: 
 
Mock mock = MockManager.Mock("OtherClass");
DateTime returnDateTime = new DateTime(...);
mock.ExpectAndReturn("Method", returnDateTime);


Hope it helps :)
answered by ohad
Report User
 (35.4k points)
0 votes
yes I stumbled across .ExpectUnmockedSet which allows me to have a delegate function called to intercept the parameter value set by the propety set method while at the same time allowing unmocked calls.

Thanks for your help.
answered by alastair.cameron@kal
Report User
 (3.4k points)
0 votes
oops :oops:
Now I noticed.
I messed up the answers
The answer above is regarding your other post.

Just to clean the table:
If there something that's still unclear in one of the posts please tell me.
Sorry about the mess.
answered by ohad
Report User
 (35.4k points)
...

Products

Help

Company

Community

Contact

Typemock Store (US toll FREE 866–895–4680). Copyright © 2006 Typemock Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Use.