chevron-thin-right chevron-thin-left brand cancel-circle search youtube-icon google-plus-icon linkedin-icon facebook-icon twitter-icon toolbox download check linkedin phone twitter-old google-plus facebook profile-male chat calendar profile-male
0 votes
Hello,

though TypeMock is a great tool we really need a coverage predication (statement) about tested code. At the moment you can only run TypeMock OR a profiler/coverage tool. Would be nice if we can run both together.


Ciao,
Michael
asked by mknaup (8.5k points)

3 Answers

0 votes
Hello,
though TypeMock is a great tool we really need a coverage predication (statement) about tested code. At the moment you can only run TypeMock OR a profiler/coverage tool. Would be nice if we can run both together.


Hi Michael,
I am happy that you find TypeMock a usefull tool.
We are aware of this request and have started to implement it already, it should be out in coming versions. We are facing some patent issues (non technical) so I don't know exactly when this feature will be out.

:?: This is actually a good place to ask what Profiler/Coverage tool you ar using so that we can support them when this feature is released
answered by scott (32k points)
0 votes
Hi,

I would appreciate cooperation with some profiler/coverage tool too.

Currently I am using NCover (http://www.ncover.org/) and I have to stay with NMock because it enables code coverage.

But anyway, TypeMock looks great for me.

Ondrej
answered by marw (140 points)
0 votes
Hi,
:idea: This feature is part of version 2.3 (Professional and Enterprise Editions).
You can use this feature in Demo Mode to test it before purchasing.
Registered Users Get the Demo License.
answered by scott (32k points)
...