chevron-thin-right chevron-thin-left brand cancel-circle search youtube-icon google-plus-icon linkedin-icon facebook-icon twitter-icon toolbox download check linkedin phone twitter-old google-plus facebook profile-male chat calendar profile-male
Ask a question
The Unit Testing Company
Development Resources
Knowledge Base
Welcome to Typemock Community! Here you can ask and receive answers from other community members. If you liked or disliked an answer or thread: react with an up- or downvote.

Related questions

Verify passed without method called

0 votes
hi the following code passes 

using (RecordExpectations expectations = RecorderManager.StartRecording())
                expectations.ExpectAndReturn(XElement.Load(""), null).RepeatAlways();

            new Timer(state => XElement.Load(""), null, 3000, 23000);
            MockManager.VerifyWithTimeout(2000);
[quote][/quote]
asked by tolisss
Report User
 (28.8k points)

3 Answers

0 votes
Hi Tolisss,

There seems to be a bug :(

We will work on fixing this issue for the upcoming version of Isolator and we will notify you when this issue is resolved.
answered by dhelper
Report User
 (11.9k points)
0 votes
Hi,

Actually as far as I know, specifying a "RepeatAlways" semantically means: expect zero or more calls on the method.
therefore since the only expectation set in this example uses the "RepeatAlways" directive, the verify is expected to pass even if no calls are made.

I might be mistaken though :wink:
answered by error
Report User
 (6.6k points)
0 votes
That's right, I missed the RepeatAlways definition.

Tolisss - I guess you can specify the numbers of times you want this call to happen i.e. use the default and not RepeatAlways to expect only one call.
answered by dhelper
Report User
 (11.9k points)
...

Products

Help

Company

Community

Contact

Typemock Store (US toll FREE 866–895–4680). Copyright © 2006 Typemock Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Use.