chevron-thin-right chevron-thin-left brand cancel-circle search youtube-icon google-plus-icon linkedin-icon facebook-icon twitter-icon toolbox download check linkedin phone twitter-old google-plus facebook profile-male chat calendar profile-male
Ask a question
The Unit Testing Company
Development Resources
Knowledge Base
Welcome to Typemock Community! Here you can ask and receive answers from other community members. If you liked or disliked an answer or thread: react with an up- or downvote.

Related questions

Typemock - Unit test missing and wrong code coverage result

0 votes
Hi,

I normally use Resharper test runner to run unit test which shows that I have around 500 test for "ClassA" in "Test_ClassA"

However, when I go to TypeMock -> Run - > All Test, it shows that there's only 163 tests.

Plus, when I go to TypeMock -> Coverage -> Solution.

The "ClassA" didn't even show in the list. It display Test_ClassA instead with empty coverage values.

 

May I ask if you have any idea about what's going on ?

 

Thanks

Maverick
asked by cscmh99
Report User
 (6.1k points)

1 Answer

0 votes
 

The coverage is reported only for tests that ran with Typemock SmartRunner so this actually makes sence.

Which test framework do you use for Test_ClassA?

answered by alex
Report User
 (17k points)
I'm using nunit WITH typemock for Test_ClassA

May i know why the coverage report makes sense to you ?

I'm talking about the Coverage report include ALL libraries in the list EXCEPT the library i'm testing. Is there any misunderstanding here ?
commented by cscmh99
Report User
 (6.1k points)

Is it Nunit 3?

If not, try the following:

  1. Close the solution in VS.
  2. Find <SolutionName>.IsolatorCache.user file near your <SolutionName>.sln and delete it.
  3. Reopen VS.

 

The coverage reprots are generated when you run tests with Typemock Runner.

If the runner doesn't see some tests than the code that these tests cover is absent from the solution coverage,

Making the runner identify all your test should fix the coverage as well.

commented by alex
Report User
 (17k points)
I guess the first problem would be the problem of TypeMock runner FAILED to identify all my test.

I didn't do too much test.

But, seeems like a combination of a "private static method" followed with a test case using [TestCase(param1, param2, param2)] will make ALL subsequence unit test disappear for TypeMock runner. Is that a known issue ?
commented by cscmh99
Report User
 (6.1k points)
...

Products

Help

Company

Community

Contact

Typemock Store (US toll FREE 866–895–4680). Copyright © 2006 Typemock Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Use.