chevron-thin-right chevron-thin-left brand cancel-circle search youtube-icon google-plus-icon linkedin-icon facebook-icon twitter-icon toolbox download check linkedin phone twitter-old google-plus facebook profile-male chat calendar profile-male
Ask a question
The Unit Testing Company
Development Resources
Knowledge Base
Welcome to Typemock Community! Here you can ask and receive answers from other community members. If you liked or disliked an answer or thread: react with an up- or downvote.

Related questions

Swap.NextInstance(int)/Swap.AllFutureInstances()

0 votes
See Post -> https://www.typemock.com/community/viewtopic.php?p=4756#4756

Would've been nice to have...
asked by boo
Report User
 (21.8k points)

3 Answers

0 votes
I second that! We also need Swap.AllFutureInstances (or Swap.AllNextInstances()).
answered by vagif
Report User
 (19.4k points)
0 votes
I agree too. We need Swap.AllInstances or Swap.AllFutureInstances
so that we dont write the same Isolate.Swap.NextInstance<T> again n again when u have mutiple instances to fake.
answered by omarfaruk
Report User
 (800 points)
0 votes
Luckily for us - its already part of future development of Isolator
answered by dhelper
Report User
 (11.9k points)
...

Products

Help

Company

Community

Contact

Typemock Store (US toll FREE 866–895–4680). Copyright © 2006 Typemock Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Use.