Evaluation Questions

Is it possible to fake private/internal and thus mock private/internal methods/properties/fields? Example? How about private/internal classes that have non-default constructors (arguments required). How about 'child' classes (where my private classes are).

I use MSTest religously and take advantage of the ability to natively test the private/internal items using the 'accessors' made in the 'shadow' assembly. Often I need to test private classes that are private for a reason; having this ability is essential. How does this framework perform with non-public generics, specifically creating an instance of a custom generic class that isn't public, or a private collection of List<T>? This is often a sore-point.

So far I'm very impressed by the framework - I'm a big fan of AOP, and of PostSharp framework, and this takes things a step further in a direction I like and have been looking for; however, how does this interact with other mocks such as PostSharp? If I happen to be using PostSharp to add an aspect around all my methods for logging purposes or auditing or some other functionality, how is Typemock going to interact? Is one going to destroy the other? If so, can I use Typemock for just regular mocks? Method boundaries are my particular expectations and implementation of interfaces.

What is the feature set difference between the free and pay version? If I use the free version at home playing around, and I say this is great for my company, I need to tell my boss if there are differences.